The Effect of New
Regulations under the Charities Accounting Act
By TERRANCE S. CARTER, B.A., LL.B.
CHARITY LAW BULLETIN No. 4 - April 12, 2001
Background to Regulation
This Bulletin No. 4 provides a more detailed commentary from Bulletin No.
1 on regulation 04/01, adopted under Section 5.1 of the Charities Accounting
Act by the Public Guardian and Trustee of Ontario (“PGT”) on February 3rd,
2001 (“the Regulation”). A copy of the
Regulation is attached to this Bulletin as an Appendix.
The Regulation had been anticipated
ever since Section 5.1 of the Charities Accounting Act was passed in
1996. Section 5.1 authorized the
adoption of regulations by the Attorney General to permit certain prescribed
activity involving charitable property that would otherwise have required the
approval of the Superior Court of Justice.
This involved the following:
•permitting
directors to receive remuneration from charities on whose boards of
directors they sit;
•permitting
charities to indemnify trustees, executors, directors and officers for
personal liability arising
out of their offices, as well as to purchase directors
and
officers liability insurance; and
•allowing
charities to co-mingle multiple restricted funds held by the charity into a
single account or investment portfolio.
No Relief To Common Law Rule
Prohibiting Directors From Receiving Remuneration:
Unfortunately, the Regulation that
was adopted does not authorize directors and trustees to receive any
remuneration from the charity on which they serve. Therefore, the common law rule in Ontario still applies, i.e.
that directors of a charity, in their quasi trustee role, have a fiduciary
obligation not to put themselves into a conflict of interest by receiving
remuneration, either directly or indirectly, from the charity on which they
serve as a director. The Public
Guardian and Trustee has indicated that further regulations dealing with this
issue may be passed in the future but, for now, the current common law in
Ontario continues to apply.
Consequently, it will continue to be necessary for the board of a charity
and its legal counsel to ensure that the charity’s by-laws and other constating
documents do not permit the remuneration of directors other than for
reimbursement of out of pocket expenses.
Some of the consequences arising of
the new Regulation failing to authorize the remuneration of directors are as
follows:
•Charities
may continue to find it difficult to attract qualified candidates to their
board of directors where those candidates are providing goods and services to
the charity, either at or below market value, such as inexpensive or pro-bono
services by a lawyer or accountant.
•Some
religious charities for doctrinal reasons may find it theologically
unacceptable that their minister cannot be a member of the controlling board of
the church simply because the minister receives remuneration from the church.
In those situations, it may be necessary for churches or other religious
organizations to make an application for a consent order from The PGT
under section 13 of the Charities Accounting Act to permit such payment.
•For
those charities that do not want to go to the trouble or expense of obtaining a
consent order from the PGT, an alternative would be to structure the
by-law and other constating documents of the charity so that the employee in
question, such as an executive director, will not be a member of the Board of
Directors but will be given substantive rights over the day to day operations
of the charity, including the right to
receive notification of all board
meetings, be present at all board meetings, and participate at all board
meetings (save and except when such board meetings are dealing with the
position of the Executive Director) but without such person being a member of
the board of directors. For a more
detailed discussion concerning issues involving remuneration of directors, see
articles by the author entitled “Remuneration of Directors in Ontario” and
“Update on Remuneration of Directors in Ontario” available at www.charitylaw.ca.
Indemnification of Directors and Officers and Liability Insurance:
Under the Regulation, a charity may indemnify
a trustee or executor or, where the executor or trustee is a corporation,
indemnify the directors or officers of the corporation for personal liability
arising from an act or omission in performing his or her duties. However, a charity may not indemnify a
director or officer for liability arising from a failure to act honestly and in
good faith in performing those duties.
The ability of a charitable
corporation to adopt an indemnity by-law had been in question as a result of an
error in the wording in previous amendments to the Corporations Act. However, this omission has recently been
corrected through a further amendment to the Corporations Act which now
ensures that Ontario non-share capital corporations can indemnify their
directors and officers, provided that the requirements of the Regulation
adopted under the Charities Accounting Act have been followed.
The Regulation also provides that
insurance may be purchased to cover
personal liability arising from the act or omissions of the executors,
trustees, directors or officers of a charity in performing their duties. However, the terms of the insurance or
indemnification must not impair a person’s right to bring legal action against
the executor, trustee, director or officer.
In addition, the Regulation states that the purchase of the insurance
policy must not unduly impair the carrying out of the religious, educational,
charitable or public purposes for which the charity holds property. The Regulation further states that the
executor or trustee, and if the executor or trustee is a corporation, the board
of directors of the corporation, must consider the following before giving an
indemnity or purchasing insurance:
•The
degree of risk to which the executor, trustee, director or officer is or may be
exposed;
•Whether,
in practice, the risk cannot be eliminated or significantly reduced by means
other than the indemnity or insurance;
•Whether
the amount or cost of the insurance is reasonable in relation to the risk;
•Whether
the cost of the insurance is reasonable in relation to the revenue available to
the charity; and
•Whether
it advances the administration and management of the charitable property to
give the indemnity or purchase the insurance.
The Regulation states that no
indemnity may be paid or insurance purchased if to do so would result in the
amount of debts and liabilities exceeding the value of the charitable property
or, if the executor or trustee is a corporation, render the corporation
insolvent. Another limitation is that
the indemnity may only be paid or the insurance purchased from the charitable
property to which the personal liability relates and not from any other
charitable property. This would appear
to mean that the income from segregated funds, such as endowment funds, that
would otherwise not normally attract potential liability for a director or
officer should not be used to purchase directors and officers liability
insurance or to pay an indemnity.
The consequences of the Regulation
permitting indemnification of directors and officers of a charity and the
purchase of liability insurance can be summarized as follows:
•It
will be important for the directors of a charity to carefully review all of the
Regulation to ensure that the directors are complying with its terms before
proceeding with the adoption of an indemnification by-law or the purchase of
directors and officers liability insurance.
•If
the charity complies with the Regulation, it is important to determine whether the
indemnification by-law has been passed and/or insurance has been purchased
prior to the publication of the Regulation on February 3rd, 2001. Since the Regulation is not stated to be
retroactive, it is possible that an indemnification by-law adopted prior to the
publication of Regulation 04/01 may need to be passed as a new by-law or may
require the adoption of a current resolution that the board of directors have
reviewed the conditions and terms of Regulation 04/01 and are satisfied that
the indemnification in question and/or the purchase of liability insurance
complies with the terms and conditions of the Regulation.
•Since
charities will in most circumstances now be able to purchase directors and
officers liability insurance from the funds of the charity, it will become less
problematic to recruit qualified volunteers as directors to its board of
directors.
Charities May Co-Mingle Restricted and Special Purpose Funds:
Under the Regulation, a charity may
now co-mingle property funds received for a restricted or special purpose with
other properties similarly received into a single account or investment
portfolio. However, a number of
restrictions and obligations are imposed by the Regulation which may make the
option of co-mingling funds difficult or impractical. In this regard, a charity that is intending to co-mingle property
or funds held or restricted or special purposes:
•May
only do so if it advances the administration and management of each of the
individual restricted funds;
•Must
allocate all gains, losses, income and expenses rateably on a fair and
reasonable basis to the individual funds; and
•Must maintain detailed records relating to each individual
fund, including the following:
-
the value of the individual fund immediately
before it becomes part of the combined fund, and the date on which it becomes
part of the combined fund;
-
the value of any portion of the individual fund
that does not become part of the combined fund;
-
the source and the value of contributed fund
(i.e. additional fund that is added to and forms part of a pre-existing
individual fund) relating to an individual fund, and the date on which the
contributed fund is received;
-
the value of the contributed fund immediately
before it becomes part of the combined fund, and the date on which it becomes
part of the combined fund;
-
the amount of the revenue received by the
combined fund that is allocated to the individual fund, and the date of each
allocation;
- the amount of the expenses paid from
the combined fund that are allocated to the individual fund, and the date of
each allocation; and
- the
value of all distributions from the combined fund made for the purposes of the
individual fund, and the purpose and date of each distribution.
•Must
maintain detailed records relating to the combined fund, including the
following:
-
the value of each individual fund that becomes
part of the combined fund, and the date on which it becomes part of the
combined fund;
- the value of each contributed fund
that become part of the combined fund, the date on which it becomes part of the
combined fund, and the details of the individual funds to which the contributed
fund relates;
- the
amount of the revenue received by the combined fund, the amount allocated to
each individual fund, and the date of each allocation;
-
the amount of expenses paid from the combined
fund, the amount allocated to each individual fund and the date of each allocation;
and
- the value of all distributions from
the combined fund made for the purposes of an individual fund and the purpose
and date of each distribution.
In light of the double records that
must be maintained and the detail required for those records, a charity may
decide that it is simpler and less problematic to maintain each restricted or
special purpose trust fund in a separate account for investment purposes
notwithstanding the likely lower rate of return for the over all portfolio
investment of the charity. It is
therefore important for the board of directors of a charity to weigh the
benefits to be gained from combining restricted and special purpose funds
against the significant administrative costs and aggravation of keeping the
necessary records in order to co-mingle restricted and special purpose
funds. It is also important for the
board of a charity to realize that co-mingling restricted or special purpose
funds in contravention of the Regulation will expose the directors to
allegations of breach of trust and resulting personal liability.
Terrance S. Carter practices at Carter & Associates in Orangeville,
Ontario and is affiliated with and counsel to Fasken, Martineau, DuMoulin LLP in
Toronto, Ontario. He specializes in the area of charity and not-for-profit law.
DISCLAIMER:
This Legal Update is
provided as an information service to our clients and is a summary of legal
matters. It is not meant to be a legal opinion. Readers are cautioned not to
act on information provided herein without seeking specific legal advice with
respect to their unique circumstances. Comments and suggestions are welcome.
BARRISTERS,
SOLICITORS & TRADE-MARK AGENT
211
Broadway, P.O. Box 440
Orangeville,
Ontario, L9W 5G2
Telephone:
(519) 942-0001
Fax:
(519) 942-0300
REGULATION MADE UNDER THE CHARITIES ACCOUNTING ACT
APPROVED ACTS OF EXECUTORS
AND TRUSTEES
Ontario Regulation 04/01
Filed: Jan. 17, 2001
Gazette: Feb. 3, 2001 (proposed)
APPROVAL OF SPECIFIED ACTS
1. (1) The acts authorized by this
Regulation that would otherwise require the approval of the Superior Court of
Justice in the exercise of its inherent jurisdiction in charitable matters
shall be treated, for all purposes, as though they had been so approved.
(2) Subsection (1)
does not constitute authorization of an act that conflicts with one of the
following in a particular case:
1. The will or the instrument in writing relating to the property.
2. A court order relating to the will or instrument or relating to
the property.
(3) An executor or trustee must
maintain records demonstrating that he, she or it has complied with the
requirements of this Regulation when engaging in an act that is authorized
under subsection (1).
(4) An executor or trustee is not required by virtue of this Regulation
to give any indemnity or to make any payment.
AUTHORIZATION TO INDEMNIFY
2. (1) In the
circumstances and subject to the restrictions set out in this section, an executor
or trustee and, if the executor or trustee is a corporation, each director or
officer of the corporation may be indemnified for personal liability arising
from their acts or omissions in performing their duties as executor, trustee,
director or officer.
(2) An
executor, trustee, director or officer cannot be indemnified for liability that
relates to their failure to act honestly and in good faith in performing their
duties.
(3) In the circumstances and
subject to the restrictions set out in this section, insurance may be purchased to indemnify the executor,
trustee, director or officer for the personal liability described in subsection
(1).
(4) The terms of the indemnity or insurance policy must not impair a
person’s right to bring an action against the executor, trustee, director or
officer.
(5) The executor or trustee or,
if the executor or trustee is a corporation, the board of directors of the
corporation shall consider the following factors before giving an indemnity or
purchasing insurance:
1. The degree of risk to which the executor, trustee, director or
officer is or may be exposed.
2. Whether, in practice, the risk cannot be eliminated or
significantly reduced by means other than the indemnity or insurance.
3. Whether the amount or cost of the insurance is reasonable in
relation to the risk.
4. Whether the cost of the insurance is reasonable in relation to
the revenue available to the executor or trustee.
5. Whether it advances the
administration and management of the property to give the indemnity or purchase
the insurance.
(6) The purchase of insurance must not, at the time of the purchase,
unduly impair the carrying out of the religious, educational, charitable or
public purpose for which the executor or trustee holds the property.
(7) No indemnity shall be paid or insurance purchased if doing so would
result in the amount of the debts and liabilities exceeding the value of the
property or, if the executor or trustee is a corporation, render the
corporation insolvent.
(8) The indemnity may be paid or the insurance purchased from the
property to which the personal liability relates and not from any other
charitable property.
(9) If the executor, trustee, director or officer is deceased, the
indemnity or the proceeds of the insurance may be paid to his or her estate.
COMBINING PROPERTY HELD FOR RESTRICTED OR
SPECIAL PURPOSES
3. (1) In
this section,
contributed property” means, in respect of an individual
property, additional property that is added to, and forms part of, a
pre-existing individual property.
(2) In the circumstances and
subject to the restrictions described in this section, an executor or trustee
may combine property received by the executor or trustee for a restricted or special
purpose with other property received by the executor or trustee for another
restricted or special purpose and may hold the combined property in one account
in a financial institution or invest it as if it were a single property.
(3) The property may be combined
only if it advances the administration and management of each of the individual
properties to do so.
(4) All gains, losses, income and
expenses must be allocated rateably, on a fair and reasonable basis, to the
individual properties in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
(5) The executor or trustee must
maintain the following records for each of the individual properties, in
addition to such other records as may be required by law:
1. The value of the individual property
immediately before it becomes part of the combined property, and the date on
which it becomes part of the combined property.
2. The value of any portion of the individual
property that does not become part of the combined property.
3. The source and the value of contributed
property relating to an individual property, and the date on which the
contributed property is received.
4. The value of the contributed property
immediately before it becomes part of the combined property, and the date on
which it becomes part of the combined property.
5. The amount of the revenue
received by the combined property that is allocated to the individual property,
and the date of each allocation.
6. The amount of the expenses paid from the
combined property that are allocated to the individual property, and the date
of each allocation.
7. The value of all distributions from the
combined property made for the purposes of the individual property, and the
purpose and date of each distribution.
(6) The executor or trustee must maintain the
following-records for the combined property, in addition to such other records
as may be required by law:
1. The value of each individual property that
becomes part of the combined property, and the date on which it becomes part of
the combined property.
2. The value of contributed property that
becomes part of the combined property, the date on which it be comes part of
the combined property, and details of the individual property to which the
contributed property relates.
3. The amount of the revenue received by the
combined property, the amount allocated to each individual property and the
date of each allocation.
4. The amount of the expenses paid from the
combined property, the amount allocated to each individual property and the
date of each allocation.
5. The value of all distributions from the combined property made for the
purposes of an individual property and the purpose and date of each
distribution.